BRP
A 12-amino-acid peptide cleaved from the BRINP2 protein that activates appetite-regulating neurons in the hypothalamus (not POMC neurons) through a pathway separate from GLP-1, leptin and MC4R. Identified by Stanford's Svensson lab with a computational prohormone-cleavage prediction tool and published in Nature (2025). Preclinical only — no human trial has been registered as of October 2026.
What is BRP?
BRP (BRINP2-Related Peptide) is a 12-amino-acid peptide with the sequence THRILRRLFNLC, corresponding to residues 386–397 of the human BRINP2 protein (BMP and retinoic acid inducible neural-specific 2). It sits between KK and KR cleavage sites in its 78-kDa secreted parent, mouse genetics suggest prohormone convertase 1 (PCSK1) is at least partly responsible for releasing it, only the C-terminally amidated form is active, and it is detectable endogenously in human cerebrospinal fluid at roughly 700 pM to 3 nM. Given as a drug, BRP reduces food intake by activating neurons in several hypothalamic nuclei (including the arcuate and dorsomedial nuclei) — but not the pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons often named in media coverage — through a mechanism that is independent of leptin, the GLP-1 receptor, and the melanocortin 4 receptor, unlike approved incretin and MC4R-targeted drugs. It was identified by the Svensson lab at Stanford using 'Peptide Predictor', a rule-based computer program that scans protein sequences for prohormone-convertase cleavage motifs, and published in Nature in March 2025. All published data is preclinical (mice, rats and minipigs); no human trial has been registered as of October 2026.
What BRP Is Investigated For
BRP is investigated as a non-incretin anti-obesity peptide that targets the same downstream outcome as semaglutide — appetite reduction and weight loss — but through a different upstream mechanism. In the published Nature work, a single injection (into the abdominal cavity in mice, into muscle in minipigs) cut food intake by 20–50% in mice and by 50% at one hour in minipigs, and 14 days of daily injections left obese mice about 4 g lighter than saline-treated controls (Stanford's press release described this as about 3 g lost versus 3 g gained), with the loss coming from fat rather than lean mass and alongside improved glucose and insulin tolerance. Critically for the 'natural Ozempic' framing that drives public interest: no conditioned taste aversion, no pica (a rat nausea proxy), no change in gastric emptying or fecal output, no muscle loss, and no movement changes or anxiety-like behavior were observed in the animal models. The caveats are substantial. Only preclinical data exists. The receptor BRP binds has not been identified (its signalling resembles a Gs-coupled GPCR driving cAMP-PKA-CREB-FOS, inferred from inhibitor experiments in cultured cells), and the neurons it acts on are POMC-negative cells whose identity is unknown. Its potency is low (about 30 µM for half-maximal activity in cells) and it lasts under 10 minutes in mouse plasma, so the authors say chemical optimization is needed before it could become a practical drug. No human trial has been registered, and no human efficacy or safety signal exists. Any 'BRP peptide' sold on the research-chemical market in 2026 is selling a compound that has not been tested in a single human and whose purity, provenance, and pharmacokinetics in humans are entirely unknown.
History & Discovery
BRP was identified by Laetitia Coassolo and colleagues in Katrin Svensson's laboratory at Stanford Medicine (Stanford's international patent application claims priority to August 2022, and the paper was submitted to Nature in August 2023), as part of a broader computational-functional program to identify previously uncharacterized bioactive peptides released from secreted proteins. The group's 'Peptide Predictor' program (regular-expression pattern matching rather than machine learning) screens the human secretome for the paired basic-residue motifs (KR, RR, RK, KK) that prohormone convertases cleave, producing a list of candidate peptide products that would be generated if the precursor protein were processed. Of 2,082 secreted human proteins scanned, 373 looked like prohormones and yielded 2,683 predicted peptides; 100 short candidates were synthesized and screened for Fos induction in neuronal and pancreatic cell lines, and the top hits were tested in feeding studies, and BRP — the 12-residue fragment of BRINP2 — emerged as the strongest non-incretin anti-obesity hit. The paper was published in Nature on 5 March 2025 (volume 641, issue 8061, pages 192–201) under the title 'Prohormone cleavage prediction uncovers a non-incretin anti-obesity peptide.' Svensson co-founded Merrifield Therapeutics to advance BRP toward human trials, and the discovery drew broad media attention in 2025 and 2026 under the 'natural Ozempic' framing — a useful shorthand for public audiences but an imprecise description of the underlying pharmacology. Both the receptor and the POMC-negative neurons BRP acts on remain unidentified, and the published work explicitly leaves them as future work. Nature Reviews Endocrinology and Nature Reviews Drug Discovery ran research highlights on the paper in spring 2025, but as of October 2026 no other laboratory has published a replication.
How It Works
BRP is a short natural peptide that your brain makes in small amounts. In animal studies, extra BRP switches on a group of appetite-regulating neurons in the hypothalamus. These are not the well-known POMC neurons, and BRP did not activate the brainstem, which the authors link to its lack of nausea-like effects. This reduces hunger and food intake, leading to fat loss — without the nausea-like responses that GLP-1 drugs trigger in the same animal tests. But this has only been tested in mice, rats and pigs so far; no one has tried it in humans yet.
BRP corresponds to amino acids 386–397 of BRINP2 (THRILRRLFNLC), flanked by KK and KR cleavage sites. Brain BRP was nearly absent in male, and 50–80% lower in female, mice carrying a PCSK1 mutation, suggesting prohormone convertase 1 (PCSK1) is at least partly responsible for releasing it. The active form carries a C-terminal amide; the non-amidated peptide had no activity in cells. The peptide is detectable in normal human cerebrospinal fluid at concentrations between ~700 pM and ~3 nM, indicating it is an endogenous signaling peptide and not merely a synthetic fragment. Injected BRP raised FOS (a marker of neuronal activation) in the dorsomedial, preoptic, tuberal and arcuate nuclei of the hypothalamus but not in the hindbrain or brainstem. The activated arcuate cells did not co-stain for POMC; the authors describe them as POMC-negative neurons of unknown identity. In cultured neuronal cells, BRP's signalling resembled a Gs-coupled G-protein-coupled receptor (identity unresolved): it elevates intracellular cAMP, activating protein kinase A (PKA), which phosphorylates the transcription factor CREB, driving FOS expression and neuronal activation. A single leucine (Leu8) was required for this signalling. In metabolic cages, BRP-treated mice ate fewer meals with longer gaps between them, not smaller meals. Their respiratory exchange ratio fell, suggesting a shift toward burning fat, but oxygen consumption (a measure of energy expenditure) did not change, so eating less is the main driver of the weight loss. Critically, the published work shows that BRP's anti-obesity effect is independent of the three best-characterized appetite pathways (tested with a GLP-1 receptor-blocking drug, leptin-deficient ob/ob mice and Mc4r-knockout mice; GLP-1 receptor knockout mice were not used): leptin signaling, the GLP-1 receptor (the target of semaglutide/tirzepatide and the full incretin class), and the melanocortin 4 receptor (the target of setmelanotide). This places BRP in a 'non-incretin' anti-obesity category distinct from the approved incretin and MC4R drugs. The authors' proposed explanation for the lack of nausea-like responses is that BRP activates the hypothalamus but not the brainstem; it also did not change gastric emptying in mice. Given together with GLP-1 in mice, the two had additive effects on food intake, consistent with parallel pathways. Beyond the brain, BRP also activated a pancreatic beta-cell line in the original screen, so effects in other tissues cannot be ruled out.
Evidence Snapshot
Human Clinical Evidence
None. In March 2025 Stanford said a company co-founded by the senior author would launch human trials, but as of October 2026 none is registered. Endogenous BRP has been measured in human cerebrospinal fluid (about 0.7–3 nM), establishing it as a naturally occurring peptide in humans, but no human has been given BRP in a trial.
Animal / Preclinical
Consistent within the primary paper but not yet independently replicated. In lean mice (intraperitoneal, 5 mg/kg) food intake fell 20–50%, and in minipigs (intramuscular, 2 mg/kg, n = 4 per group) by 50% at one hour. In obese mice, 14 days of daily injections left animals about 4 g lighter than vehicle controls, with fat loss, no lean-mass loss, and improved glucose and insulin tolerance. BRP also lowered food intake and body weight in leptin-deficient ob/ob and Mc4r-knockout mice. No conditioned taste aversion, no pica in rats, no muscle loss and no behavioural changes. Liraglutide produced greater initial weight loss than BRP in the same obese-mouse study, at a far lower dose (0.1 mg/kg vs 5 mg/kg BRP).
Mechanistic Rationale
Moderate. Hypothalamic FOS activation and a cAMP-PKA-CREB-FOS cascade (shown in cultured neuronal cells) are well-validated appetite-control signals, but the responding neurons are POMC-negative and unidentified. The gap is the unidentified receptor: without knowing which GPCR BRP binds, off-target profiling and medicinal-chemistry optimization are materially constrained.
Research Gaps & Open Questions
What the current literature has not yet settled about BRP:
- 01Receptor and cell identity — the receptor BRP binds (presumed, not proven, to be a Gs-coupled GPCR) and the POMC-negative hypothalamic neurons it activates have not been identified. Until they are, target engagement, off-target profiling, and structure-activity relationship work are materially constrained.
- 02Human efficacy and safety — zero human administration data exists. The jump from rodent and minipig results to human efficacy is where most anti-obesity candidates fail.
- 03Pharmacokinetics in humans — half-life, clearance, bioavailability by subcutaneous vs other routes, and distribution are unstudied.
- 04Durability of weight loss — whether BRP-driven weight loss plateaus, rebounds on discontinuation, or translates into long-term metabolic improvement is unknown.
- 05Tolerance on chronic dosing — repeated exposure did not desensitize cultured cells, and mice kept responding over 14 days, but longer dosing has not been studied.
- 06Head-to-head comparison vs modern GLP-1 drugs — the paper compared BRP only with liraglutide and native GLP-1 in mice and minipigs (liraglutide gave greater initial weight loss in obese mice). There is no comparison with semaglutide or tirzepatide in any species.
- 07Potency and half-life — BRP needed about 30 µM for half-maximal activity in cells, milligram-per-kilogram doses in animals, and left mouse plasma in under 10 minutes; the authors say chemical optimization is needed before it could be a practical drug.
- 08Physiological role — injected BRP is enough to cause weight loss, but whether the body's own BRP regulates appetite, and how its levels change with fasting or overeating, is unknown.
- 09Independent replication — as of October 2026 no other laboratory has published a replication of the BRP feeding results.
- 10Interaction with approved anti-obesity drugs, including combination potential with incretin agonists.
Forms & Administration
In the published preclinical work, BRP was given by intraperitoneal injection in mice and intramuscular injection in minipigs; it also suppressed feeding in mice when given intranasally or directly into the brain. Its half-life in mouse plasma was under 10 minutes, and only the C-terminally amidated form was active, which matters for anyone evaluating a vendor product. It is not available through any approved human-use channel. Reference-grade synthetic BRP is sold by specialty biochemistry suppliers for in vitro and animal research; any human use of such material is not supported by any human safety data and is not an authorized route. No approved human formulation, dose, or dosing schedule exists.
Dosing & Protocols
The ranges below reflect protocols commonly discussed in the literature and by clinicians — not a prescription. Actual dosing for any individual should be determined by a qualified healthcare provider who knows the patient.
Typical Range
No human dose exists. The published animal work used intraperitoneal injection in mice, where 5 mg/kg was the standard effective dose, 0.5 mg/kg had no effect and 20 mg/kg almost completely stopped eating over 3 hours. Minipigs got a single 2 mg/kg intramuscular injection. The effective dose range, dose-response relationship, and human-equivalent conversion are not established.
Frequency
Animal studies used single pre-meal injections for acute appetite assessment and daily injections for 14-day body-weight studies. No pharmacokinetic profile in humans exists to inform frequency.
Timing Considerations
No specific timing requirements: can be administered at any time of day, with or without food, and is not tied to exercise timing. Consistency matters more than the specific clock — dose at roughly the same time each day (or same day each week, for weekly protocols) to keep exposure steady.
Protocol Notes
The safety, efficacy, and dosing of BRP in humans have not been established. Any human use outside of an eventual registered clinical trial is unvalidated. Research-chemical-market preparations have no verified identity, purity, stability, or pharmacokinetic profile. The compound is an early-stage investigational peptide, not a commodity. Its authors say it still needs 'chemical optimization to enhance potency and achieve effective dosing'. In cells it needed about 30 µM for half-maximal effect, and in mouse plasma its half-life was under 10 minutes — properties that make the native peptide a poor drug as it stands. Animal doses in milligrams per kilogram cannot be converted into a meaningful human amount, and the inactive non-amidated form would be indistinguishable on a vendor label.
BRP is not FDA-approved, has no human safety or efficacy data, and is not intended for human use outside of a registered clinical trial. This section describes the published animal dosing framework for reference only — it is not a human protocol.
Common Questions
Is BRP available to buy?
Not through any approved clinical channel. The peptide exists as a reference standard at specialty biochemistry suppliers (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Novopro, and similar) for laboratory research, and the media coverage of the 2025 Nature paper has fuelled 'natural Ozempic' marketing aimed at consumers. Because no human trials have been conducted, there is no established safe human dose, no pharmacokinetic data in humans, no formulation or purity standard, and no clinical context for use. Anything sold as 'BRP' for human administration in 2026 predates any meaningful human safety data.
Is BRP the same as Ozempic?
No, and the 'natural Ozempic' media framing obscures important differences. Ozempic (semaglutide) is a GLP-1 receptor agonist that reduces appetite by activating GLP-1 receptors in the brainstem, gut, and pancreas. BRP activates non-POMC neurons in the hypothalamus (and not the brainstem) through a still-unidentified receptor, with a signaling cascade (cAMP-PKA-CREB-FOS) that operates independently of GLP-1 receptors, leptin, and MC4R. The two peptides share a downstream outcome (reduced food intake and weight loss) but reach it by different routes. BRP is also approximately the size of a natural peptide fragment (12 amino acids) rather than an engineered 31-amino-acid analog, and its endogenous human form is detectable in CSF — a different biological starting point than semaglutide's.
How was BRP discovered?
The Svensson lab at Stanford wrote a computer program called 'Peptide Predictor' (a rule-based pattern matcher, although Stanford's press release called it AI) that scanned the 2,082 secreted proteins in the human proteome for sequences that would be cleaved by prohormone convertases (the enzymes that release active peptide hormones from larger precursors). It flagged 373 likely prohormones yielding 2,683 candidate peptides. The team synthesized 100 short (5–25 amino acid) candidates of unknown function and screened them for their ability to switch on the activity gene Fos in neuronal and pancreatic cell lines. BRP raised Fos more than tenfold in both, then suppressed feeding in mice. This computational-to-functional workflow (sequence rules to predict uncharacterized endogenous peptides, then testing in cells and animals) is itself a new discovery method, and BRP is its first published validation. The code is public on GitHub.
What company is developing BRP for humans?
Merrifield Therapeutics, a start-up co-founded by Katrin Svensson (senior author on the Nature paper), is the company named in the paper's competing-interests statement; Svensson and first author Laetitia Coassolo are named inventors on Stanford's BRP patent filings. In March 2025 Stanford said Svensson had co-founded a company to launch human trials 'in the near future', but as of October 2026 no IND has been publicly disclosed and no trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Development timelines are unclear, and any near-term investor or media coverage should be read as early-stage discovery, not late-stage clinical development.
How is BRP different from MC4R agonists like setmelanotide?
Setmelanotide is an MC4R agonist — it directly activates the melanocortin 4 receptor downstream of POMC. BRP does not appear to work through the POMC-MC4R system at all. The neurons it activated in the arcuate nucleus did not overlap with POMC neurons, and it still cut food intake and body weight in mice lacking MC4R. That makes BRP a separate appetite pathway rather than a different point in the same one, although the MC4R-knockout result has only been shown in mice.
Does BRP cause nausea like GLP-1 drugs?
Not in the animal tests so far. In mice, BRP did not cause conditioned taste aversion (a standard nausea-linked test in which lithium chloride did), did not change gastric emptying and did not change fecal output. In rats it did not cause pica (eating clay, a nausea proxy, which the chemotherapy drug cisplatin did). The authors link this to BRP activating the hypothalamus but not the brainstem. Animals cannot report nausea directly, so only human trials can settle the question.
Did BRP beat semaglutide or liraglutide in the study?
BRP was never tested head-to-head against semaglutide. The paper compared it with liraglutide (an older daily GLP-1 drug) and with native GLP-1. In minipigs, BRP's one-hour appetite effect was similar to liraglutide's. In obese mice over 14 days, liraglutide produced greater initial weight loss than BRP, which was given at a far higher dose (5 mg/kg vs 0.1 mg/kg). BRP's appeal is its different mechanism and favourable animal side-effect profile, not superior potency.
Is BRP really a natural human peptide?
Partly established. Using mass spectrometry, the Stanford team detected BRP in human cerebrospinal fluid at about 0.7–3 nM and in mouse brain, and levels fell sharply in mice with a defective PCSK1 enzyme. What the body's own BRP does is unknown: the paper shows that injected BRP is enough to cause weight loss, not that natural BRP regulates appetite.
Who BRP Is NOT For
- •Pregnancy and breastfeeding — no reproductive-toxicology data of any kind exists in humans or animals.
- •Pediatric use — no data, no dosing framework, endocrine effects on development unstudied.
- •Concurrent use with approved anti-obesity drugs (semaglutide, tirzepatide, setmelanotide, bupropion/naltrexone) — no interaction data exists.
- •Known hypersensitivity to peptide therapeutics or to excipients in any specific preparation.
- •Any use outside of an eventual registered clinical trial — this is the honest baseline contraindication given the preclinical-only evidence status.
Drug & Supplement Interactions
No formal interaction studies have been conducted in humans. Theoretical considerations, all unvalidated: combined use with GLP-1 or dual/triple incretin agonists would stack two appetite-suppressive pathways — in mice, BRP plus native GLP-1 suppressed food intake more than either alone, but no combination has been tested in humans; combined use with setmelanotide is untested (BRP still worked in Mc4r-knockout mice, so the two appear to act on separate pathways); and anti-hyperglycemic medications would require glucose monitoring given the preclinical improvement in glucose tolerance. Any concurrent medication use should be disclosed to the prescribing clinician in any future BRP trial.
Safety Profile
Common Side Effects
Cautions
- • Preclinical only — no human safety data of any kind exists
- • Not FDA-approved for any indication; no IND publicly disclosed and no trial registered as of October 2026
- • Any 'BRP' sold outside of approved clinical trials is by definition an unverified research chemical
- • The molecular receptor target has not been identified, so off-target effects cannot be systematically assessed yet
- • Long-term effects of repeatedly activating the hypothalamic neurons BRP targets are not characterized; the longest published dosing was 14 days in mice
- • Low potency and a very short half-life in animals mean any future drug may look quite different from the native 12-residue peptide
What We Don't Know
Human pharmacokinetics, optimal dose, optimal dosing interval, long-term tolerability, durability of weight loss, rebound on discontinuation, interactions with incretin agonists and other anti-obesity drugs, effects in adolescents and elderly populations, and behavior in pregnancy and lactation are all unstudied.
Legal Status
United States
BRP is not FDA-approved for any indication. As of October 2026, no investigational new drug (IND) application has been publicly disclosed and no trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Stanford University holds a published international patent application on BRINP2-derived peptides for obesity (WO2024030214), naming Svensson and Coassolo among the inventors. It is not a scheduled substance. Synthetic BRP is available from reference-biochemistry suppliers for laboratory research purposes; sale to consumers as a 'research chemical' labeled 'not for human consumption' is in a gray zone — the labeling disclaims human use, and human administration is not supported by any approved channel. Status will depend on whether and when Merrifield Therapeutics files an IND and initiates a Phase 1 trial.
International
No regulatory authority (EMA, MHRA, TGA, Health Canada, PMDA) has authorized BRP. It is an unapproved investigational peptide globally.
Sports & Competition
WADA has not named BRP specifically. As an unapproved investigational compound it falls under WADA's S0 'Non-approved substances' category, which prohibits at all times any pharmacological substance without approval by a government health authority for human therapeutic use, including drugs under pre-clinical development. Athletes subject to anti-doping testing should treat BRP as prohibited by default until a specific ruling is issued.
Regulatory status changes over time. Verify current local rules with a qualified professional.
Myths & Misconceptions
Myth
BRP is a natural version of Ozempic.
Reality
The 'natural Ozempic' framing is useful media shorthand but inaccurate pharmacology. Ozempic (semaglutide) is a GLP-1 receptor agonist. BRP's appetite effect does not depend on the GLP-1 receptor. It activates POMC-negative hypothalamic neurons through a still-unidentified receptor and the cAMP-PKA-CREB-FOS pathway. The two share a downstream behavioral output (reduced food intake) but reach it through different upstream machinery. Being a natural peptide fragment is also not the same as being safe or effective in humans — no human has been dosed in a trial yet.
Myth
BRP is available to buy if you know where to look.
Reality
Specialty reagent suppliers do sell synthetic BRP to qualified research labs as a reference standard, and 'natural Ozempic' marketing has followed the 2025 Nature paper. None of this constitutes approved human availability. No dose has been validated in humans, no purity or potency standard exists outside the research-reagent channel, and no pharmacokinetic data in humans has been collected. Using research-chemical-market BRP in humans in 2026 is a leap across an evidence gap that is much larger than similar-sounding peptides that do have human data.
Myth
BRP causes no side effects.
Reality
The 'no side effects' claim derives from animal studies where nausea, constipation, muscle loss, and behavioral changes were not observed. That is a promising preclinical signal, not a human safety statement. Many drugs with clean animal tolerability have revealed new side effects in people, and animals cannot report nausea directly. Human trials are the only way to establish BRP's side-effect profile, and those have not happened.
Myth
BRP works by increasing metabolism, not reducing appetite.
Reality
The Nature paper points mainly to appetite. BRP lowered the respiratory exchange ratio (a hint of a shift toward burning fat) but did not change oxygen consumption or body temperature, so there was no measurable rise in energy expenditure; the mice ate less because they ate fewer meals. But the dominant acute effect in animal studies — up to 50% appetite reduction within one hour of a single dose — is an appetite-suppressive signal. Framing BRP as a 'metabolism booster' claims a thermogenic effect the paper did not find and undersells the appetite-control mechanism.
Myth
BRP will be available as a weight-loss drug soon.
Reality
Merrifield Therapeutics has been formed to develop BRP for humans, but no IND has been publicly disclosed and no human trial has been registered as of October 2026. Even a fast program would need Phase 1 safety work and larger efficacy trials before approval, and most early anti-obesity candidates do not get that far. Any near-term product availability claim is speculative.
Myth
BRP works by switching on POMC neurons, the same appetite cells used by older drugs.
Reality
This claim appears in many articles and explainers, but the Nature paper found the opposite. BRP-activated cells in the arcuate nucleus did not co-stain for POMC, and the authors describe BRP as acting on POMC-negative hypothalamic neurons. BRP also kept working in mice lacking MC4R, the receptor downstream of POMC neurons.
Myth
BRP was discovered by artificial intelligence.
Reality
Stanford's press release credited AI, but the paper describes Peptide Predictor as an in-house program built on regular-expression pattern matching: a set of sequence rules that finds the paired basic amino acids that prohormone convertases cut. Computational bioactivity scorers were used only to estimate how many predicted peptides might be active. BRP itself was picked out by laboratory screening of 100 synthetic peptides.
Published Research
5 studiesNon-incretin peptide curbs appetite
A novel anti-obesity peptide that targets the hypothalamus
Prohormone cleavage prediction uncovers a non-incretin anti-obesity peptide
The primary Nature paper (Coassolo, Svensson et al., 2025; volume 641, pages 192–201; DOI 10.1038/s41586-025-08683-y). Describes the rule-based 'Peptide Predictor' program that scanned the human secretome for PCSK cleavage motifs, predicted 2,683 peptides from 373 precursors, and screened 100. It identified BRP as a non-incretin anti-obesity hit that activates POMC-negative hypothalamic neurons in mice and reduces food intake in minipigs.
Naturally occurring molecule rivals Ozempic in weight loss, sidesteps side effects (Stanford Medicine News)
Brinp2-derived peptide compositions for treating obesity and weight management (WO2024030214A2, Stanford University)
Quick Facts
- Class
- Non-Incretin Hypothalamic Anorexigenic Peptide
- Tier
- D
- Evidence
- Preliminary
- Safety
- Limited Data
- Updated
- Oct 2026
- Citations
- 5PubMed
Also known as
Tags
Related Goals
Evidence Score
Clinical Trials
View Clinical TrialsLinks to ClinicalTrials.gov for reference. Listing does not imply endorsement.