Skip to content

Bronchogen

A synthetic tetrapeptide bioregulator (Ala-Glu-Asp-Leu) from the Khavinson system, studied for bronchial epithelial maintenance, mucin gene regulation, and adjunct use in chronic bronchitis and COPD within the Russian bioregulator framework.

DPreliminaryLimited Data
Last updated 17 citations

What is Bronchogen?

Bronchogen is a synthetic tetrapeptide consisting of alanine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, and leucine (Ala-Glu-Asp-Leu, or AEDL), developed as part of Vladimir Khavinson's short peptide bioregulator program at the St. Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology. It is classified as a Cytogen — a lab-synthesized short peptide based on a short sequence that the Khavinson group reports detecting by mass spectrometry in Langopept, a peptide preparation made from bronchial tissue, with its principal biological target being the respiratory epithelium and deeper lung tissue. Within the Khavinson respiratory pair, Bronchogen (AEDL) is framed as aimed at bronchial epithelial cell differentiation and maintenance, and is commonly discussed alongside Chonluten (EDG tripeptide), which is positioned more for stress-protective and anti-inflammatory gene regulation in the same tissue. In Russia, Bronchogen is sold as an oral capsule registered as a biologically active food supplement rather than a medicine, with each 0.2 g capsule listing 100 micrograms of the peptide complex; Western users mostly buy it from research-chemical vendors.

What Bronchogen Is Investigated For

Bronchogen is a Khavinson-program tetrapeptide investigated for bronchial epithelial maintenance, mucin gene regulation, and adjunct use in chronic bronchitis and COPD within the Russian bioregulator framework. The strongest mechanistic evidence is preclinical: peer-reviewed work from the Khavinson group reporting that the AEDL tetrapeptide regulates expression of bronchial epithelial genes — including the thyroid transcription factor NKX2-1 and the mucin genes MUC4 and MUC5AC — in cultured human embryonic bronchial epithelial cells, supported by small rat studies of nitrogen-dioxide-induced COPD and of bacterial, fibrotic and high-oxygen lung injury. The central honest caveat is that Western replication is absent, no randomized controlled trials are indexed in Western databases, and the only Bronchogen-specific human data is an unpublished, manufacturer-reported 2007 add-on study in chronic bronchitis with an asthmatic component that gives no patient numbers or between-group statistics. The proposed mechanism of direct DNA interaction by a tetrapeptide remains debated. Bronchogen is not FDA-approved, is not a recognized US dietary supplement ingredient (although Russia registers it as a dietary supplement), and should not substitute for evidence-based management of COPD, asthma, or chronic bronchitis.

Bronchial epithelial maintenance and cell differentiation
Preliminary30%
Mucin gene regulation (MUC4, MUC5AC) and airway mucosal function
Preliminary30%
Adjunct support for chronic bronchitis with asthmatic component
Limited15%
Adjunct framing for COPD and age-related respiratory decline
Limited15%
Anti-aging of lung tissue via gene expression modulation
Limited15%

History & Discovery

Bronchogen comes out of Vladimir Khavinson's peptide bioregulator program, which began at the Kirov Military Medical Academy (where tissue-extract drugs such as Thymalin and Epithalamin were developed in the 1980s–90s) and continued at the St. Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology, source of synthetic short peptides such as Epithalon, Livagen, Cortagen and the broader Cytogen / Cytomax series. According to Khavinson's 2020 review, the group used high-sensitivity chromatography-mass spectrometry to find two short peptides in Langopept, a bronchial-tissue peptide preparation: the tripeptide EDG (named Chonluten) and the tetrapeptide Ala-Glu-Asp-Leu (named Bronchogen). The synthetic tetrapeptide was patented in Russia (priority June 2004) and the US (US 7,625,870, granted December 2009) for restoring respiratory function after bacterial lung inflammation, fibrosis and toxic lung injury. The same review says that after preclinical testing Bronchogen was submitted to the Russian Ministry of Health for registration as a medicine; it is currently sold as a dietary supplement. Within the respiratory branch of the catalog, Bronchogen is paired with Chonluten (Glu-Asp-Gly), with Bronchogen positioned as aimed at bronchial epithelial cell differentiation and mucin-producing machinery and Chonluten aimed more at stress-protective and anti-inflammatory gene programs in the same tissue. The indexed footprint for Bronchogen is real but small: cell-model studies reporting AEDL regulation of NKX2-1 and the MUC4 / MUC5AC mucin genes, review articles placing AEDL within the broader Khavinson respiratory framework, rat studies of lung injury and nitrogen-dioxide COPD, test-tube DNA- and histone-binding work, and an unpublished, manufacturer-reported 2007 add-on study in chronic bronchitis with an asthmatic component. No new lung study of AEDL has been indexed in PubMed since 2017; the most recent AEDL research is in plant biology, where a Moscow agricultural biotechnology group reports that it stimulates tobacco root growth. As with the rest of the Khavinson lineup, this work is concentrated in Russian laboratories (the rat COPD studies come from a separate pulmonology team), has not been replicated by Western respiratory biology laboratories, and has not generated Western-standard controlled clinical trial data for any defined respiratory indication. Bronchogen reaches Western users almost exclusively through imported Russian oral capsules and through research-chemical lyophilized vials, neither of which represents validated therapeutic use.

How It Works

Bronchogen is a small four-amino-acid peptide proposed to enter bronchial and lung cells and help regulate the genes that keep the airway lining healthy. The Khavinson group reports that it changes the activity of genes involved in bronchial epithelial maintenance, including mucin production and lung-specific transcription factors, which is theorized to support airway function as the respiratory system ages or becomes chronically inflamed.

Bronchogen (Ala-Glu-Asp-Leu) is proposed to penetrate cell membranes due to its small molecular size and interact with DNA regulatory regions in respiratory epithelial cells. In cultured human embryonic bronchial epithelial cells, the Khavinson group reports that AEDL regulates expression of the thyroid transcription factor NKX2-1 (TTF-1), a master regulator of lung and bronchial epithelial differentiation, and activates the mucin genes MUC4 and MUC5AC, which encode components of the airway mucus barrier. The same 2014 study also reports effects on SCGB1A1, SCGB3A2, FOXA1, FOXA2 and the surfactant gene SFTPA1 and on the proliferation markers Ki67 and Mcl-1, most strongly in older, late-passage cultures. For AEDL specifically, test-tube studies report binding in the DNA major groove at guanine N7, a rise of about 3 °C in DNA melting temperature, loosening of nucleosome cores in liver chromatin, and binding to wheat histones. They disagree on what sequence it prefers: CTG- or CNG-containing sequences in fluorescence studies, a ctcc site in a docking model, and no AT or GC preference in a calorimetry study. In aging bronchial cell cultures, the group links AEDL's effects on NKX2-1 and SCGB1A1 to changes in promoter DNA methylation. Computer docking from the same program ranks AEDL among the stronger predicted binders of the LAT1, LAT2 and PEPT1 transporters, proposed (but not measured in cells) as a cellular uptake route for short bioregulator peptides, supporting systemic accessibility of the respiratory epithelium after oral or parenteral dosing. Within the originating group's framing, Bronchogen is paired functionally with Chonluten (Glu-Asp-Gly), which is described as contributing anti-inflammatory and stress-protective gene regulation (c-Fos, HSP70, SOD, COX-2, TNF-alpha) in the same tissue. Independent Western replication of the AEDL-specific gene regulation signal has not been published, and the 'direct DNA interaction by a tetrapeptide' component of the model remains contested outside the Khavinson research orbit.

Evidence Snapshot

Overall Confidence17%

Human Clinical Evidence

Very limited. No peer-reviewed human study of Bronchogen is indexed in PubMed and no trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. The only Bronchogen-specific data is a manufacturer-hosted report of a 2007 add-on study at the St. Petersburg institute's clinic in chronic bronchitis with an asthmatic component (1–2 capsules twice daily for 20–30 days), reporting fewer coughing and choking episodes in 73% of treated patients but giving no patient numbers or described randomization. The low-oxygen performance and chronic-bronchitis findings sometimes credited to Bronchogen are attributed in the Khavinson literature to the EDG tripeptide (Chonluten), not AEDL. No randomized controlled trials are indexed in Western databases, and no Western clinical adoption has occurred.

Animal / Preclinical

Preliminary. In cultured human embryonic bronchial epithelial cells, the Khavinson group reports that AEDL changed expression of differentiation genes (NKX2-1, SCGB1A1, SCGB3A2, FOXA1, FOXA2) and activated MUC4, MUC5AC and SFTPA1, with stronger effects in late-passage cultures. In rats, the developers' patent reports faster lung repair after bacterial pneumonia, milder bleomycin-induced fibrosis and protection against high-oxygen injury at 0.2 micrograms per kg. A separate team at the Research Institute of Pulmonology (Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University), publishing without Khavinson co-authors, reported that one month of Bronchogen reversed goblet cell hyperplasia, squamous metaplasia and emphysema and reduced neutrophilic inflammation in rats with nitrogen-dioxide-induced COPD. All of this work is small, Russian, and unreplicated in Western laboratories.

Mechanistic Rationale

Moderate-within-framework, low-outside-framework. The proposed mechanism of tissue-specific gene regulation (mucin genes, lung transcription factors) is at least internally consistent and anchored in identifiable gene targets. However, the 'short peptide directly binds DNA' model that underpins the Khavinson framework as a whole has not been independently validated outside that research program, and no bronchoalveolar or pulmonary biomarker data in humans confirms that the in vitro gene-regulation signal translates to clinical effect.

Research Gaps & Open Questions

What the current literature has not yet settled about Bronchogen:

  • 01No randomized controlled trial of Bronchogen has been published or registered on ClinicalTrials.gov; the only human data is an unpublished 2007 manufacturer report without patient numbers or between-group statistics.
  • 02The papers do not agree on the sequence label: the key 2014 Lung study and a 2011 DNA study print the peptide as Ala-Asp-Glu-Leu (ADEL), while the patent and later reviews use Ala-Glu-Asp-Leu (AEDL), and none explains the difference.
  • 03The rat COPD findings (less goblet cell hyperplasia and neutrophilic inflammation after nitrogen-dioxide exposure) come from one Russian team and have not been repeated in other COPD models or outside Russia, and they sit uneasily with the cell-culture report that AEDL activates the mucin gene MUC5AC.
  • 04The in vitro signal that AEDL upregulates NKX2-1, MUC4, and MUC5AC has not been independently replicated by bronchial epithelial biology laboratories outside the Khavinson research orbit, leaving the central mechanistic claim single-source.
  • 05The AEDL-DNA binding studies disagree on what the peptide recognizes (CTG- or CNG-containing sequences, a ctcc site, or no AT/GC preference), all were done in test tubes or computer models, and none has shown binding at specific gene promoters inside living respiratory cells.
  • 06No human pharmacokinetic data meeting Western regulatory standards exists for oral or injectable Bronchogen, so oral bioavailability, plasma half-life, tissue distribution to bronchial epithelium, and dose-response relationships are all unmeasured.
  • 07Whether any in vitro gene-regulation effect of AEDL translates to measurable bronchoalveolar biomarkers (sputum mucin composition, airway inflammation markers, lung function indices) in humans has not been formally tested.
  • 08Long-term safety of repeated chromatin- and transcription-level modulation in aging or chronically inflamed respiratory epithelium is unknown, including any theoretical oncologic consequence of chronically altering NKX2-1, a gene amplified as a lineage oncogene in some lung cancers, in at-risk lung tissue.
  • 09Whether Bronchogen offers any incremental benefit over standard guideline-directed care in COPD, asthma, or chronic bronchitis has not been tested against a placebo or active comparator in a controlled design, leaving its real-world adjunct value unverified.

Forms & Administration

Bronchogen is sold in Russia as an oral dietary-supplement capsule (0.2 g, listing 100 micrograms of a peptide complex of alanine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid and leucine). The 2007 manufacturer report used 1–2 capsules twice daily for 20–30 days, and Russian sellers typically suggest monthly courses repeated after 4–6 months. Research-chemical vendors sell lyophilized vials, but no injected dose has ever been studied in people; the only published injected doses are from rats (0.2 micrograms per kg into the abdominal cavity daily for 7 days, in the developers' patent). All peptides should only be used under the guidance of a qualified healthcare provider. Never self-administer without clinician oversight.

Common Questions

What is the difference between Bronchogen and Chonluten?

Both are Khavinson bioregulator peptides targeting the respiratory system but they address different aspects. Bronchogen (AEDL, a tetrapeptide) is framed as targeting bronchial epithelial cell differentiation and maintenance, with reported regulation of genes like NKX2-1, MUC4, and MUC5AC. Chonluten (EDG, a tripeptide) is positioned more for stress-protective and anti-inflammatory gene regulation in bronchial mucosa, with reported modulation of c-Fos, HSP70, SOD, COX-2, and TNF-alpha. Khavinson reports that both sequences were detected in the same bronchial peptide preparation (Langopept), and his group's reviews describe both as effective orally in chronic bronchopulmonary disease, but the two specific clinical findings they cite — better results of standard therapy in chronic bronchitis with an asthmatic component and better performance under low oxygen — are credited to EDG (Chonluten), not AEDL.

Can Bronchogen be taken orally?

Yes. Bronchogen is sold in Russia as an oral capsule (100 micrograms of peptide per 0.2 g capsule) and is registered there as a dietary supplement, not a medicine. The developers' patent claims the peptide can be given orally or by injection, but their animal studies used injections, and no study has measured whether AEDL survives digestion or reaches lung tissue in people. Research-chemical injectable forms also exist outside Russia.

Is Bronchogen's sequence Ala-Glu-Asp-Leu or Ala-Asp-Glu-Leu?

The developers' patent and most Khavinson-group papers give Bronchogen as Ala-Glu-Asp-Leu (AEDL). Two often-cited studies print it differently: the 2014 Lung paper on bronchial epithelium calls the peptide Ala-Asp-Glu-Leu (ADEL), and a 2011 DNA study is titled 'Effect of the peptide bronchogen (Ala-Asp-Glu-Leu) on DNA thermostability'. Later Khavinson reviews cite the Lung paper as AEDL work, so this looks like a labeling inconsistency rather than a different molecule, but the papers do not explain it.

Has Bronchogen been tested in human clinical trials?

Not in any peer-reviewed or registered trial. PubMed lists no human study of Bronchogen and ClinicalTrials.gov lists no trial. The only human data is a manufacturer-hosted account of a 2007 study at the clinic of the St. Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology, in which people with chronic bronchitis with an asthmatic component took 1–2 capsules twice daily for 20–30 days on top of standard therapy. It reports fewer coughing and choking episodes in 73% of the Bronchogen group, but gives no patient numbers or randomization method, so it cannot show that Bronchogen caused the improvement.

Is Bronchogen FDA-approved?

No. Bronchogen is not FDA-approved and is not used in mainstream Western medicine. Clinical data comes primarily from Russian research institutions associated with the Khavinson bioregulator program. No published randomized controlled trials are indexed in Western databases and there is no Western regulatory pathway for its use in any respiratory indication.

Is Bronchogen a treatment for COPD?

No. Bronchogen is not approved as a COPD treatment by any regulatory body and there are no controlled trials supporting it as a COPD therapy. The only human data is an unpublished manufacturer report of Bronchogen added to standard care in chronic bronchitis with an asthmatic component, which is far short of demonstrating it treats COPD. In rats with nitrogen-dioxide-induced COPD, one month of Bronchogen reduced airway remodeling and neutrophilic inflammation, which is an animal signal, not proof of benefit in people. Standard COPD management (bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids, pulmonary rehabilitation) remains the evidence-based approach.

Who Bronchogen Is NOT For

Contraindications
  • •Active or recently treated bronchopulmonary malignancy, given that NKX2-1 is a lineage-survival transcription factor implicated in lung adenocarcinoma biology and the long-term consequences of AEDL's reported effects on NKX2-1 expression in at-risk epithelium have not been characterized.
  • •Pregnancy and lactation, where no reproductive toxicology, teratogenicity, or lactational transfer data exist for the AEDL tetrapeptide.
  • •Pediatric use, where developing bronchial epithelium and lung transcription factor programs have not been studied for the effects of exogenous Khavinson bioregulator peptides.
  • •Known hypersensitivity to short synthetic peptide bioregulators or to any excipient in the Russian-market oral capsule formulation.
  • •Acute severe respiratory failure or status asthmaticus, where Bronchogen has no evidence of acute benefit and substituting it for guideline-directed bronchodilator, corticosteroid, or oxygen therapy is unsafe.
  • •Patients relying on Bronchogen as a substitute for evidence-based management of COPD, asthma, or chronic bronchitis, given the absence of controlled trials supporting it as monotherapy.
  • •Severe hepatic or renal impairment, where peptide handling and clearance of Khavinson bioregulators have not been formally characterized and where compromised organ function increases the consequence of any unexpected accumulation.

Drug & Supplement Interactions

No formal drug-interaction studies have been conducted with Bronchogen, and the Khavinson clinical literature does not characterize it against the cytochrome P450, transporter, or pharmacodynamic interaction frameworks used in Western drug development. Theoretical considerations follow from the proposed mechanism rather than from observed events. If the in vitro signal that AEDL upregulates the mucin genes MUC4 and MUC5AC translates to humans, concurrent use with mucolytic or mucoactive agents (N-acetylcysteine, carbocisteine, ambroxol, hypertonic saline) is conceptually relevant but uncharacterized — direction and magnitude of any net mucus-handling effect are unknown. Notably, in rats with nitrogen-dioxide-induced COPD, Bronchogen reduced goblet cell hyperplasia (the mucus-cell overgrowth typical of COPD), so the cell-culture mucin-gene signal does not simply mean more mucus. Because the only clinical report describes Bronchogen as an add-on to standard chronic bronchitis therapy of that era, the closest thing to a clinical interaction signal is in that context, not against modern inhaled corticosteroid / LABA / LAMA regimens. The proposed LAT-family amino acid transporter uptake route is shared by other Khavinson short peptides, leaving open a theoretical competition or additive-load consideration when multiple bioregulators are stacked, but this has not been measured. Patients on inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting bronchodilators, biologics for severe asthma, immunosuppressants, or any oncologic therapy should treat Bronchogen as an unknown variable and discuss it with the prescribing clinician before use rather than assume the absence of indexed interaction reports means absence of interaction.

Safety Profile

Safety Information

Common Side Effects

Generally well-tolerated in available Russian clinical use reportsNo significant side effects identified in the published Khavinson literatureRare individual hypersensitivity reactions theoretically possible

Cautions

  • • Not FDA-approved
  • • Clinical data is limited and primarily from Russian research
  • • The only human safety information is an unpublished manufacturer report stating no side effects, without patient numbers or systematic adverse-event collection
  • • Toxicology exists only as the developers' own animal summary in their patent (single doses 5,000 times the therapeutic dose, plus 90-day rat and 6-month guinea-pig studies), not as peer-reviewed or GLP studies; no pharmacokinetic studies have been published
  • • No drug interaction studies have been conducted
  • • Quality and purity vary by source outside Russian pharmaceutical-equivalent channels

What We Don't Know

Western clinical trial data is absent. No human dose-escalation or pharmacokinetic data exist, and the only toxicology is the developers' unpublished animal summary in their patent. The claimed mechanism of direct DNA interaction by a tetrapeptide remains debated in the broader scientific community and comes almost entirely from the Khavinson group and its long-time collaborators in Moscow and Tbilisi. Long-term safety in chronic lung disease populations has not been evaluated in controlled studies, and safety of repeated chromatin- and transcription-level modulation in aging respiratory epithelium is unknown.

Myths & Misconceptions

Myth

Bronchogen is a proven treatment for COPD and chronic bronchitis.

Reality

No randomized controlled trial supports Bronchogen as a treatment for COPD, asthma, or chronic bronchitis. The only human data is an unpublished 2007 manufacturer report of Bronchogen added to standard care in chronic bronchitis with an asthmatic component, with no patient numbers or between-group statistics, which is far short of demonstrating treatment efficacy. Guideline-directed bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids, and pulmonary rehabilitation remain the evidence-based foundation of COPD and asthma management.

Myth

Because Bronchogen is an oral capsule sold in Russia, it has been validated for systemic absorption and clinical effect.

Reality

Registration in Russia as a dietary supplement is a regulatory status, not a pharmacokinetic validation. No Western-standard human pharmacokinetic study has measured the oral bioavailability of AEDL, the tissue distribution to bronchial epithelium, or the relationship between oral dose and any clinical endpoint. The Khavinson framework's claim that its short peptides reach systemic circulation in biologically active amounts after oral dosing remains framework-internal, not externally validated.

Myth

Bronchogen and Chonluten are interchangeable Khavinson respiratory peptides.

Reality

They are positioned for different roles within the same tissue. Bronchogen (AEDL, tetrapeptide) is framed as targeting bronchial epithelial cell differentiation and mucin-producing machinery, with reported regulation of NKX2-1, MUC4, and MUC5AC. Chonluten (EDG, tripeptide) is framed for stress-protective and anti-inflammatory gene regulation, with reported modulation of c-Fos, HSP70, SOD, COX-2, and TNF-alpha. Khavinson reports both were found in the same bronchial peptide preparation, but their published claims differ: the low-oxygen performance and bronchitis add-on results are credited to EDG, while AEDL's evidence is mainly cell-culture and rat data.

Myth

The mechanism — short peptides directly binding DNA to control gene expression — is mainstream molecular biology.

Reality

It is not. The Khavinson model of sequence-specific direct DNA binding by tri- and tetrapeptides, with downstream histone interactions altering chromatin accessibility of tissue-specific gene clusters, has been proposed and elaborated almost entirely within the originating research program. Mainstream transcriptional regulation models center on much larger DNA-binding proteins with structured binding domains, and the AEDL-specific claim has not been independently replicated outside the Khavinson orbit.

Myth

Bronchogen has been shown to be safe long-term because Russian users report few side effects.

Reality

Absence of indexed adverse-event reports in a small, single-orbit clinical literature is not the same as demonstrated long-term safety. The only toxicology is the developers' patent summary (where 6 months of daily injections raised white-cell counts in guinea pigs), there is no Western-standard pharmacovigilance, and no controlled long-term safety study has been published. The theoretical safety questions around chronic transcription-factor and mucin gene upregulation in aging or at-risk respiratory epithelium remain unresolved.

Myth

Clinical studies have proven Bronchogen works for chronic bronchitis.

Reality

The clinical study cited by sellers traces back to one 2007 report from the developer's own clinic. It has no patient numbers, no described randomization, and statistics that compare patients only with their own baseline, and it has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal or registered as a trial.

Published Research

17 studies

Structural Features of Root Cells of Nicotiana tabacum Grown in the Presence of Short Peptides AEDL and Its Methylated Analog AED(OMe)L.

PreclinicalPMID: 42589425

Feasibility of Transport of 26 Biologically Active Ultrashort Peptides via LAT and PEPT Family Transporters.

PreclinicalPMID: 36979488

Transport of Biologically Active Ultrashort Peptides Using POT and LAT Carriers

ReviewPMID: 35887081

Peptide Regulation of Gene Expression: A Systematic Review

ReviewPMID: 34834147

Peptides: Prospects for Use in the Treatment of COVID-19

Review proposing short peptides as COVID-19 adjuncts; groups AEDL (Bronchogen) and EDG (Chonluten) as bronchoprotectors and summarizes AEDL's reported gene effects in bronchial cells, while crediting the specific bronchitis and low-oxygen clinical findings to EDG.

ReviewPMID: 32987757

Peptide Regulation of Cell Differentiation.

ReviewPMID: 31808038

[ANTIINFLAMMATORY AND REGENERATIVE EFFECT OF PEPTIDE THERAPY IN THE MODEL OF OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG PATHOLOGY].

PreclinicalPMID: 30199201

Short Peptides Regulate Gene Expression

ReviewPMID: 27909961

Modulating Effect of Peptide Therapy on the Morphofunctional State of Bronchial Epithelium in Rats with Obstructive Lung Pathology.

Research Institute of Pulmonology study (no Khavinson co-authors) in rats with nitrogen-dioxide-induced COPD: one month of Bronchogen reversed goblet cell hyperplasia, squamous metaplasia, lymphocytic infiltration and emphysema and restored ciliated cells.

PreclinicalPMID: 26468022

Epigenetic mechanisms of peptidergic regulation of gene expression during aging of human cells.

PreclinicalPMID: 25761685

Peptide regulation of gene expression and protein synthesis in bronchial epithelium

In cultured human embryonic bronchial epithelial cells, the peptide (printed in this paper as Ala-Asp-Glu-Leu, ADEL) altered NKX2-1, SCGB1A1, SCGB3A2, FOXA1 and FOXA2 expression, activated MUC4, MUC5AC and SFTPA1, boosted proliferation markers most in 'old' cultures, and bound DNA in the major groove.

PreclinicalPMID: 25015171

Peptides tissue-specifically stimulate cell differentiation during their aging.

PreclinicalPMID: 22808515

Penetration of short fluorescence-labeled peptides into the nucleus in HeLa cells and in vitro specific interaction of the peptides with deoxyribooligonucleotides and DNA.

PreclinicalPMID: 22117547

Effect of the peptide bronchogen (Ala-Asp-Glu-Leu) on DNA thermostability.

PreclinicalPMID: 21240358

[The tissue-specific effect of synthetic peptides-biologic regulators in organotypic tissues culture in young and old rats].

PreclinicalPMID: 17152728

Peptide substance restoring respiratory organs function (US Patent 7,625,870 B2)

The developers' patent (Russian priority June 2004, US grant December 2009) claiming Ala-Glu-Asp-Leu for restoring respiratory function; reports unpublished rat pneumonia, bleomycin-fibrosis and hyperoxia experiments plus acute and chronic toxicity data.

Patent

Khavinson VKh et al. Medicinal peptide preparations: past, present, future (Klinicheskaya Meditsina, 2020)

Review

Quick Facts

Class
Bioregulator Peptide
Tier
D
Evidence
Preliminary
Safety
Limited Data
Updated
Oct 2026
Citations
17PubMed

Also known as

AEDL TetrapeptideAla-Glu-Asp-LeuBronchial BioregulatorBronchogen peptideAKS-B peptide complex

Tags

BioregulatorRespiratoryBronchialAnti-AgingKhavinson Peptide

Peptide Families

Evidence Score

Overall Confidence17%

Clinical Trials

View Clinical Trials

Links to ClinicalTrials.gov for reference. Listing does not imply endorsement.